The Political Motivations of the International Criminal Court: A Tale of Two Leaders.

 

The Political Motivations of the International Criminal Court:

 A Tale of Two Leaders.

In March 2023, the International Criminal Court (ICC) made global headlines when it issued an arrest warrant against Russian President Vladimir Putin. The charges were linked to the alleged unlawful deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia during the ongoing Russia-Ukraine war. This marked a pivotal moment in international justice, signaling the ICC's intent to hold a powerful leader accountable for crimes against humanity. However, the decision was met with mixed reactions globally, with some lauding the court's actions while others questioned its motivations and legitimacy. Among the criticisms was a conspicuous comparison: why had the ICC targeted Putin, while other leaders accused of severe human rights violations, like Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, seemed untouched?

The ICC's perceived selectivity has fueled widespread debates, leading many to speculate about the political motivations driving its decisions. In understanding this apparent double standard, it is crucial to explore the history, mandate, and geopolitical dynamics surrounding the ICC.

 The Mandate of the ICC

The ICC was established in 2002 under the Rome Statute as the first permanent international court created to prosecute individuals for genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity, and the crime of aggression. Its mandate is clear: to ensure accountability and justice for the worst crimes affecting humanity. However, from its inception, the ICC has faced numerous challenges, most notably from powerful nations that are not signatories to the Rome Statute, such as the United States, Russia, China, and Israel. View 

This exclusion of key global powers has often been cited as one of the major hurdles to the ICC’s effectiveness and legitimacy. Critics argue that the court's jurisdiction is limited, allowing powerful nations to evade accountability while weaker or less influential states are disproportionately targeted.

Putin’s Case: The Russia-Ukraine Conflict

The ICC’s arrest warrant against Vladimir Putin came against the backdrop of the Russia-Ukraine war, which began in February 2022. The charges related to the forcible transfer of children from occupied territories in Ukraine to Russia, an act that international law recognizes as a war crime under the Geneva Conventions. For many, this move by the ICC was a significant step toward holding Russia accountable for its actions in Ukraine, especially given the immense human suffering caused by the conflict.

However, this decision also raised concerns about the ICC's timing and motivations. Critics argue that the arrest warrant was a political gesture, aligned with the broader geopolitical agenda of Western nations. Given the ICC’s dependence on member states for funding, enforcement, and political backing, some suggest that the court may be swayed by the interests of powerful Western countries, which have been vocally supportive of Ukraine and critical of Russia.

 

Netanyahu and the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict

In contrast to the ICC's actions against Putin, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has so far avoided any formal charges, despite long-standing allegations of human rights abuses and war crimes committed by Israeli forces against Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank. Since its establishment, Israel’s military occupation and settlement activities in Palestinian territories have drawn widespread condemnation from international human rights organizations, including Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch.

In 2021, the ICC announced it was investigating potential war crimes committed in the occupied Palestinian territories, a move that elicited a strong backlash from Israel and its allies, particularly the United States. Netanyahu, in response, denounced the ICC’s investigation as "pure anti-Semitism" and questioned the court’s legitimacy, as Israel is not a party to the Rome Statute. While the investigation is ongoing, no arrest warrants have been issued, leading to accusations that the ICC is selectively applying justice, influenced by political considerations and the backing of Israel by powerful Western nations.view 

 The Role of Geopolitics in ICC Decisions

The stark contrast between the ICC’s treatment of Putin and Netanyahu highlights a deeper issue: the role of geopolitics in international justice. The ICC is, by design, intended to be an independent institution, immune from political pressure. However, in practice, its actions have often been shaped by the global political environment.

Russia’s global standing and its isolation following the Ukraine invasion have made Putin a viable target for the ICC. Many Western nations, especially those in the European Union and NATO, have imposed harsh sanctions on Russia and supported Ukraine militarily and diplomatically. In this context, the ICC’s move against Putin can be seen as part of a broader effort to hold Russia accountable and isolate it further on the world stage.

In contrast, Israel, despite widespread criticism of its policies toward Palestinians, enjoys robust support from the United States and many European countries. This support has shielded Netanyahu and other Israeli leaders from significant international scrutiny or punishment. The United States, in particular, has consistently opposed any ICC investigations into Israel’s conduct, arguing that the court has no jurisdiction over the country.

 Conclusion: The Politics of International Justice

The ICC's actions against Putin and its apparent inaction toward Netanyahu raise uncomfortable questions about the fairness and impartiality of international justice. While the court was established to hold all individuals accountable for grave crimes, regardless of their power or position, the realities of global politics have inevitably shaped its decisions.

The ICC’s critics argue that its selectivity undermines its credibility and perpetuates a system in which powerful nations and their allies can avoid accountability. At the same time, the court's defenders maintain that its work, despite its flaws, is crucial in the fight against impunity.

Ultimately, the question of whether the ICC is politically motivated or constrained by global power dynamics is likely to persist. As the world continues to grapple with issues of justice and accountability, the court will remain at the center of these debates, its actions scrutinized for signs of bias or independence. In a world where power often dictates justice, the ICC's challenge lies in proving that it can rise above politics and deliver impartial, fair outcomes for all.

Middle East Crisis and the Possibility of a Third World War.

 

Middle East Crisis and the Possibility of a Third World War.

The Middle East has long been a focal point for global tensions due to its cultural, religious, and geopolitical significance. Today, ongoing conflicts in the region have raised concerns about the potential for a broader confrontation, including the possibility of a third world war. To understand the current crisis, it is crucial to examine the historical context, geopolitical dynamics, and the role of external powers that have shaped the Middle East. 

Historical Context and Geopolitical Significance

The Middle East's strategic importance has made it a battleground for international power struggles for centuries. Its vital resources and trade routes have drawn global attention, particularly after the discovery of oil in the early 20th century. This external interest, coupled with the region’s diverse ethnicities, religions, and political ideologies, has contributed to ongoing conflicts.

The end of the Ottoman Empire after World War I and the subsequent division of territories by colonial powers laid the foundation for many of today’s disputes. The creation of arbitrary borders often ignored ethnic and sectarian divides, fostering tensions that later erupted into violence. The establishment of Israel in 1948 further complicated the region, sparking a series of Arab-Israeli wars and fueling the ongoing Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

Contemporary Conflicts and Proxy Wars

In recent decades, the Middle East has been plagued by conflicts that have devastated local populations and drawn in regional and global powers, turning many disputes into proxy wars. The Iranian Revolution of 1979 marked a significant shift, as Iran sought to export its revolutionary ideology, setting the stage for a rivalry with Saudi Arabia, which views itself as the guardian of Sunni Islam.

The Iran-Iraq War in the 1980s, the Gulf War in the early 1990s, and the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq in 2003 all contributed to regional instability. The fall of Saddam Hussein's regime in Iraq created a power vacuum that led to sectarian conflict and the rise of extremist groups like ISIS, which seized large territories in Iraq and Syria.

The Syrian Civil War, now over a decade old, exemplifies the complexity of Middle Eastern conflicts. Initially a popular uprising against the Assad regime, it quickly turned into a multifaceted war involving various factions, including the Syrian government, rebel groups, ISIS, and Kurdish forces, all backed by foreign powers with competing interests. Russia and Iran have supported the Assad regime, while the United States, Turkey, and Gulf states have backed different opposition groups, making Syria a proxy battleground for broader geopolitical rivalries.

The Role of External Powers

External powers have played a significant role in exacerbating Middle East tensions and increasing the risk of a wider conflict. The United States has historically been a dominant force in the region, balancing its strategic interests, such as ensuring oil flow and countering terrorism, with alliances with countries like Israel and Saudi Arabia. Russia, aiming to reassert its global influence, has backed regimes like Bashar al-Assad's in Syria to challenge U.S. dominance.

China is also expanding its presence in the Middle East, driven by its energy needs and ambitions under the Belt and Road Initiative. As these powers vie for influence, the risk of miscalculation or escalation grows, raising concerns about a potential conflict involving multiple nations.

Possibility of a Third World War

The possibility of a third world war stemming from the Middle East crisis depends on various factors. The region's conflicts already involve significant international involvement, with numerous state and non-state actors pursuing different goals. A direct confrontation between major powers, particularly the United States and Russia, cannot be entirely ruled out, especially if proxy wars spiral out of control or if incidents escalate.

Nuclear proliferation adds another layer of risk. Concerns about Iran acquiring nuclear weapons have led to international negotiations, but ongoing tensions over Iran's nuclear program could trigger a nuclear arms race in the region, with catastrophic consequences.

Towards De-escalation and Peace

Despite the grim outlook, there is potential for de-escalation and peaceful resolution in the Middle East. Diplomacy, dialogue, and multilateral engagement are crucial to addressing the root causes of conflict and establishing a framework for lasting peace. Regional cooperation, such as recent normalization agreements between Israel and several Arab states, offers hope for a more stable Middle East.

The international community must actively promote peace and stability by mediating conflicts, supporting humanitarian efforts, and addressing broader issues like economic development, human rights, and governance.

In conclusion, while the Middle East remains a region fraught with danger and uncertainty, the prospect of a third world war, though possible, is not inevitable. With concerted efforts toward peace and cooperation, the international community can help prevent the escalation of conflicts and foster a more stable and prosperous future for the region and the world.

Nato's Role in Russia Ukraine war

NATO's Involvement 

NATO has been significantly involved in the Russia-Ukraine conflict, primarily through support for Ukraine rather than direct military intervention. This involvement includes military aid, economic and political support, reinforcement of the eastern flank, and humanitarian aid.

Key Areas of Involvement

1) Military Aid and Support

- **Weapons and Equipment

- **Training and Intelligence

2) Economic and Political Support

- **Sanctions on Russia

- **Diplomatic Efforts

3) Reinforcement of Eastern Flank

- **Increased Presence

- **Enhanced Readiness

4) Humanitarian Aid

- **Refugee Support

NATO's involvement in the Russia-Ukraine war is aimed at supporting Ukraine's sovereignty and territorial integrity while avoiding direct confrontation with Russia. The alliance's actions reflect a balance between aiding Ukraine and preventing the escalation of the conflict into a broader war involving NATO member states.

 Benefits of NATO's Involvement 

NATO's involvement in the Russia-Ukraine war offers several strategic, political, and economic benefits for the alliance and its member states. These benefits enhance alliance cohesion, demonstrate deterrence capabilities, strengthen geopolitical influence, expand partnerships, and promote democratic values.

Key Benefits

 1) Strengthening of Alliance Cohesion

- **Unity and Solidarity

- **Renewed Commitment

2) Demonstrating Deterrence and Defense Capabilities

- **Show of Strength

- **Improved Readiness

3) Enhanced Geopolitical Influence

- **Increased Influence in Eastern Europe

- **Global Leadership Role

4) Strengthening Partnerships and Expanding Membership

- **New Partnerships

- **Expanding the Alliance

5) Economic and Technological Benefits

- **Defense Industry Boost

- **Innovation and Cooperation

6) Promoting Democratic Values and Human Rights

- **Support for Sovereignty and Democracy

- **Humanitarian Efforts**

7) Countering Russian Influence

- **Limiting Russian Expansion

- **Weakening Russia

NATO's involvement in the Russia-Ukraine war provides numerous benefits, from strengthening alliance cohesion and enhancing deterrence capabilities to promoting democratic values and countering Russian influence. These benefits contribute to the overall security, stability, and strategic interests of NATO and its member states.

Beneficiaries

The beneficiaries of the Russia-Ukraine war can be viewed from various perspectives, including economic, political, and strategic angles. Here are some key groups and entities that have potentially benefited:

1. Defense Contractors and Arms Manufacturers:

2. Energy Producers

3. NATO and Western Allies:

4. Countries Exporting Agricultural Products:

5. Geopolitical Rivals of Russia:

6. Cryptocurrency Market:

7. Ukraine’s Military and Economy (with Western Support):

However, it is crucial to note that while certain entities may have seen benefits, the overall impact of the war has been devastating for millions of people, leading to loss of life, displacement, and economic hardship for many. The human and economic costs far outweigh any potential benefits seen by specific groups.visit  now

Future

The future of the Russia-Ukraine war is uncertain and dependent on numerous factors. Key considerations include:

Military Dynamics

Diplomatic Efforts

Economic Impact

Political Changes

Global Influence

Humanitarian Situation

While predicting the exact outcome is challenging, these factors will collectively determine the future course of the Russia-Ukraine war.

Gaza Situations Continued(updated on 26/07/2024)

Gaza Situations

Fact Now

#Israel and Hamas have significantly different perspectives on the ongoing conflict in Gaza, especially regarding the ceasefire and hostage negotiations.

Israel's Perspective: Israeli leaders, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, have been clear that any ceasefire agreement must include specific conditions, particularly regarding the release of hostages held by Hamas. Netanyahu has emphasized that Israel will not agree to a ceasefire without meeting these conditions and has rejected some proposals that he claims misrepresent Israel's position​. Furthermore, Israel is concerned about maintaining security and preventing future attacks, stressing that any cessation of hostilities must not be perceived as a capitulation​.

Hamas's Perspective: Hamas has shown a willingness to engage in discussions but has put forward its own conditions for a ceasefire. These include amendments to proposals such as a new timeline for hostage releases and a complete withdrawal of Israeli troops from Gaza. Hamas has communicated its readiness to reach an agreement through mediators like Qatar and Egypt but has rejected certain proposals that do not align with its demands​.jHamas has also welcomed international calls for a ceasefire but continues to insist on conditions that ensure its strategic and political interests are met​.

nw roposal or

Overall, the positions of Israel and Hamas remain deeply divided, with both sides seeking to secure advantageous terms while addressing their security and political concerns.

Gaza Latest Situation 

The situation in Gaza remains dire as intense conflict continues. The recent adoption of UN Security Council Resolution 2735 calls for a ceasefire and increased humanitarian aid, but the implementation faces significant challenges. Tens of thousands of people have been displaced due to ongoing hostilities, and the humanitarian situation is catastrophic.

Vice President Kamala Harris has urged Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to reach a ceasefire and address the humanitarian crisis, highlighting the urgent need for diplomacy and peace. Meanwhile, Israeli forces have intensified bombings in southern Gaza, leading to further casualties and displacement.

The international community is pushing for a resolution, emphasizing the need for humanitarian access and respect for international law. However, achieving a lasting peace remains complex, with both sides needing to commit to the ceasefire and diplomatic efforts to bring an end to the violence.

Ceasefire negotiations between Israel and Hamas have been ongoing amidst increasing violence in Gaza. Efforts led by the United States, Egypt, and Qatar are focusing on a three-phase plan that includes a temporary ceasefire, the release of hostages, and longer-term peace talks.

Additionally, a joint statement from leaders of multiple countries, including the United States, Canada, and several European nations, called for a swift agreement between Israel and Hamas to finalize the ceasefire and begin the process of rebuilding Gaza​. 

At the United Nations, Resolution 2735 was adopted with strong support, urging full implementation of the new ceasefire proposal. This resolution underscores the necessity of ending the violence, increasing humanitarian aid, and promoting a sustainable political solution​. 

Despite these negotiations, the conflict has continued to escalate. Over the past months, more than 39,000 Palestinians have been killed, with recent weeks seeing heavy bombardment in northern Gaza, forcing approximately 100,000 people to flee their homes.

Casualties

Casualties continue to mount, with reports of over 60 Palestinians killed in a single day due to Israeli strikes, including an attack on a UN school in Nuseirat.The humanitarian situation is dire, with significant shortages of food, water, and medical supplies exacerbated by ongoing hostilities.

While the ceasefire proposal offers some hope, its success depends on both parties committing to the terms and an effective implementation plan to address the humanitarian crisis and lay the groundwork for sustainable peace.

What awaits in future 

The future situation in Gaza remains highly uncertain, marked by ongoing tensions and diplomatic efforts aimed at achieving a lasting peace. A recent UN Security Council resolution has called for an immediate and complete ceasefire, emphasizing the need for a phased approach to ending the conflict. This resolution includes the release of hostages, the withdrawal of Israeli forces from populated areas in Gaza, and the provision of humanitarian aid at scale​.

The resolution, supported by key international players including the United States, aims to provide a durable solution rather than a temporary ceasefire. It envisions a multi-phase plan that includes not only an end to hostilities but also a significant reconstruction effort. However, challenges remain, particularly regarding the acceptance and implementation of these terms by both Israel and Hamas​.

In the broader context, regional stability is a significant concern. The ongoing violence has raised fears of a wider conflict involving Hezbollah in Lebanon. Diplomatic efforts by the US and France are ongoing to prevent an escalation along the Israel-Lebanon border, but the situation remains volatile​

The international community continues to push for a political settlement, with the ultimate goal being a two-state solution where Israel and Palestine can coexist peacefully. The path forward will require sustained diplomatic efforts and cooperation from all involved parties to address both immediate humanitarian needs and long-term political issues​.

<script type="text/javascript"> atOptions = { 'key' : 'e7b4beb23421e92dc160155e67390157', 'format' : 'iframe', 'height' : 50, 'width' : 320, 'params' : {} }; </script> <script type="text/javascript" src="//honourrib.com/e7b4beb23421e92dc160155e67390157/invoke.js"></script>

Gaza-Israel conflict

Gaza-Israel conflict:A glims of

The Gaza-Israel conflict is a limited piece of the Israeli-Palestinian clash beginning essentially from 1948 when 7,20,000 Palestinians escaped or were expelled from their homes.

Blogs

 War 2023 started

At around 6:30 a.m. IDT (UTC+3) on 7 October 2023, "Hamas" declared the beginning of what it called "Operation Al-Aqsa Flood" expressing it had launched more than 5,000 rockets from the Gaza Strip into Israel inside a range of 20 minutes. Join now

Hamas authorities said it was a reaction to the Israeli occupation, barricade of the Gaza Strip, Israeli pioneer savagery against Palestinians, limitations on the development of Palestinians, and detainment of thousands of Palestinians.Some 1,140 people died during the assault and around 240 were taken into Gaza as hostages.

Israel's Reaction

In light of Hamas assault Israel Defense Forces(IDF) warplanes have done air strikes across Gaza while its soldiers have a traveled through the area. State leader Benjamin Netanyahu said Israel had a "clear goal of destroying Hamas's military and governing capabilities" as well as liberating the hostages.

Hamas Story:

 "Hamas" is a Palestinian group.The name is an abbreviation for "Harakat al-Muqawama al-Islamiya", which means Islamic Resistance Movement.It's goal is to liberate Palestine and confront the Zionist project.The group is determined to armed resistance against Israel and the creation of an Islamic Palestinian state.

In 2005, Israeli singularly pulled out its settlers and troops from Gaza while holding command over its lines, beach and airspace.

The motivation behind the withdrawal plan was to work on Israel's security and global status without harmony discussions with the Palestinians.Thus Israel showed full disengagement from Gaza.Between 1994 and 1999, . Israel transferred security and civilian responsibility of the Gaza Strip and the West Bank to the Palestinian Authority.

Following the Israeli withdrawal from Gaza in 2005, Hamas won the 2006 Palestinian election and winning  in a civil war among Hamas and Fatah in 2007 gave power to Hamas overseeing Gaza.Since 2006, Hamas and Israel have battled five conflicts, the latest in 2023.

 Philistines wherefrom

The origin of the Philistines has not yet been completely explained. Most of specialists consider them to have been among the Ocean People groups, where they show up as "Peleset." The Philistines could hence have come from the Aegean islands or the Greek central area. Different scientists believe the Philistines to be an Ocean Individuals, as well, however expect the west and south shorelines of Asia Minor as their areas of beginning.

During the twelfth century BCE, the Philistines chose the fruitful shoreline of Palestine. They established five city states (Ashdod, Ashkelon, Ekron, Gath and Gaza) which then shaped a confederation. Right away, these city states were under the support of Egypt. At the point when Egyptian power melted away toward the finish of the twelfth hundred years, the Philistines expected the authority in the district. Palestine is named  after their inhabitants as “Land of the Philistines.”

 

As part of the Islamic conquest of the Middle East in the seventh century, Arab peoples began to settle in significant numbers in the land. Aside from a somewhat concise time of Crusader control, Palestine stayed under Muslim control for just shy of 12 centuries, its populace predominantly Arab.

Today, the Philistine public don't have their own country. The region where they used to occupy is currently Israel and the Palestinian Gaza Strip. It is likewise important that the name Palestine comes from the Romans, who renamed the region "Palestinia" to embarrass the Jews.

Go now

Israelis wherefrom

"Theodor Herzl"(an Austro-Hungarian Jewish columnist and political extremist) was laying the foundation of a state for Jews. Numerous Jews were moving to palestine land from Europe in waves called aliyot. The principal wave, known as the "Main Aliyah," occurred in the last part of the 1800s. A large portion of these new workers came from Russia and Yemen.

The second Aliyah came prior to World War I and comprised of Russian Jews.

The Third Aliyah came to palestine land (presently Israel) after World War I and they are from Russia.

They arrived after the establishment of the British Mandate over Palestine and the Balfour Statement of1917.

The Fourth Aliyah took put over a brief timeframe from 1924 to 1929.They are from Poland and Hungary.

The Fifth Aliyah took place between 1929 and the beginning of World War II.They are mostly from Central Europe (particularly from Poland, Germany, Austria, and Czechoslovakia) and also from Greece.

State of Israel was laid out in Palestine

In nineteenth century Zionists looked to lay out a country for the Jewish nation in Ottoman-controlled Palestine.The Balfour Statement of 1917, gave by the English government, embraced the possibility of a Jewish country in Palestine.Following The Second world War and the Holocaust, worldwide tension built for the foundation of a Jewish state in Palestine, prompting the production of Israel in 1948.

While the Territory of Israel was laid out on 15 May 1948 and confessed to the Unified Countries, a Palestinian State was not laid out.The remaining territories of pre-1948 Palestine, the West Bank - including East Jerusalem-and Gaza Strip, were regulated from 1948 till 1967 by Jordan and Egypt, individually.

 Religion and Population

While most Israelis are Jewish, a developing offer (as of now around one-in-five grown-ups) have a place with different gatherings. Most non-Jewish occupants of Israel are ethnically Arab and distinguish, strictly, as Muslims, Christians or Druze.

Presently Israel Populace is over 9 million.

Most Palestinians are Sunni Muslims, yet some are Christians of different sections. A little local area of Arab Samaritans  numbering around 400, live for the most part close to the West Bank town of Nablus, with comparable numbers situated in Israel, close to Tel Aviv.Presently Palestine Populace is 5.5 million.

Civil War 1948

On 15 May 1948, a nationwide conflict changed into a contention among Israel and the  Arab states following the Israeli Statement of Independence.During this Conflict, around 85% (720,000 individuals) of the Palestinian were expelled from their homes, fleeing toward the West Bank, the Gaza Strip, Lebanon, Syria, and Jordan and they became Palestinian refugees. A comparative number of Jews moved to Israel during the three years following the conflict, including 260,000 from the surrounding Arab states.

War 1967

On the morning of June 5, 1967, Israel sent off a preplanned strike against Egyptian powers because of Egypt's closing of the Straits of Tiran.By June 11, the contention had come to incorporate Jordan and Syria.During this conflict, Israel crushed three Arab armed forces an acquired area multiple times its unique size and turned into the superior military power in the region.Israeli claims on the domains of Sinai landmass, the Golan Levels, the West Bank, the Gaza Strip and East Jerusalem and question of the Palestinians stranded there is supposed to reach uncertainty.

War 2023

Also read

##Objective of Hamas and Israel

State head Benjamin Netanyahu said Israel had a "clear goal of destroying Hamas's military and governing capabilities" as well as liberating the hostages.He likewise pronounces Israel's objective in War 2023 is 'finished triumph' in Gaza after UN court administering.

Hamas needs to make an Islamic state instead of Israel. Hamas dismisses Israel's existence and is resolved to its destruction.Establishment of a land for Palestinians is a long pending issue which have been ignored.Hamas' objective in gaza war 2023 is to awakened the world from its profound rest and showed that this issue should stay on the table.

##Imbalance Military Power

**Israel has one of the world's most modernized armed forces outfitted with nuclear arsenal Then again, Palestinians, having no genuine state and customary armed force, don't have a lot to guard themselves.

**The Israeli Defence Forces (IDF) has almost 170,000 dynamic military faculty while it records multiple million guys and females accessible for armed force administration.

Then again, with practically no genuine state or customary armed force, Palestinian have only  30,000 to 50,000 armed personnel in troops.

**The Israeli armed force has different weapons delivered by the country's local military industry, which is quite possibly of the greatest exporter on the planet, offering arms to nations like Russia and the US. Numerous European nations are likewise clients.

While bunches like Hamas, with the assistance of different nations, need to fabricate their own rockets and other military gear in Gaza, Palestinians have no public safeguard industry.more

**Israeli Flying corps has no less than 684 fighter jets, while the Palestinians have no airplane.

## Casualties

More images

Israeli military authorities said no less than 220 soldiers have been killed during the nation's ground intrusion of Gaza, and around 240 hostages were held onto after Hamas sent off multipronged assaults on Israel on Oct. 7.On the other hand at least 26,422 Philistine individuals have been killed and 65,087 injured in Israeli assaults on Gaza since October 7. Among them all the more then 10000 are kids. Furthermore, over 64,400 have been harmed, and thousands more are missing and assumed dead.

##UN Job

On 22 November 1974, United Nations General Assembly Resolution 3236 recognised the right of the Palestinian people to self-assurance, public freedom and sovereignty in Palestine.

On 12 December 2023, U.N. General Gathering passed a goal requiring a truce with 153 nations casting a ballot in favor and 23 declining. The U.S. what's more, Israel, which contend a truce just advantages Hamas, casted a ballot against the action alongside eight different nations.

## US and UK support Israel

Washington's help for Israel is established in the fallout of The Second Great War, Previous US President Harry Truman was the primary world pioneer to perceive Israel when it was made in 1948.

Truman's business partner Edward Jacobson, assumed an essential part in laying the basis for the US in perceiving Israel as a state. Yet, there were likewise essential contemplations driving the choice.

The UK has followed Washington in attesting express help for Israel's war.London proclaimed its "unequivocal help" for Israel and sent maritime and military resources.

##ICJ Rulings

The court requested Israel to “take all measures within its power” to end acts that add to slaughter, to permit adequate helpful guide into Gaza to end the enduring among Palestinian regular citizens, and to forestall and rebuff the public assertions of induction made by senior Israeli authorities.

##UNRWA Financing Suspension

The UN Relief and Works Agency for Palestinian refugees (UNRWA) representatives were blamed for assuming parts in the October 7 assaults by Hamas.As an outcome a few nations stopped their fundings to UNRWA.The particular charges  in the dossier incorporate that somewhere around 12 of its workers had partaken in Oct.7 assault. One UNRWA laborer seizing a lady from Israel, another giving rocket-impelled projectiles and one more partaking in an assault at an Israeli kibbutz.

The vast majority of UNRWA cash comes from gifts from UN part states, with the US, Germany and the European Association. UNRWA likewise gets a little part of its financial plan straightforwardly from the UN (roughly $44 million in 2022).

Suspending help to regular citizens in Gaza at this crucial time would be aggregate discipline and a capital punishment for probably the most weak individuals.

Settling Palestine Israel struggle

Proposed approach answer for resolve the Israeli-Palestinian struggle is the one-state arrangement as indicated by which one state would be laid out between the Stream Jordan and the Mediterranean. Advocates of this arrangement says a solitary state in Israel, the West Bank and the Gaza Strip.The term one-state reality portrays the conviction that the ongoing circumstance in Israel/Palestine is true a solitary state. It is in some cases likewise called a bi-public state, attributable to the expectation that the state would be a country for the two Jews and Palestinians.

More blog